Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 13:25

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
‘Amazing Worlds of Science Fiction and Science Fact’ Review: An Education in Exoplanets - WSJ
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What are the ways in which the human body adapts to different climates and heat?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Week in Review: Meta reveals its Oakley smart glasses - TechCrunch
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
Is homosexuality an excommunicable offense in Christianity?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
If a cat is feminine in German, what article do you give to a male cat?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
I convinced HP's board to buy Palm and watched them kill it - Hacker News
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Do guys ever want to suck a dick even though they are straight?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.